AMD Phenom II X4 810 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X4 810 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 810
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.314 vs 0.587
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.172 vs 0.162
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | February 2009 vs August 2008 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.314 vs 0.587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.172 vs 0.162 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
- Around 15% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1283 vs 1047
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2473 vs 2003
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 444 vs 352
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1400 vs 1207
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 30.945 vs 7.907
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.276 vs 3.432
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz |
L2 cache | 6144 KB (per die) vs 512 KB (per core) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1283 vs 1047 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2473 vs 2003 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 444 vs 352 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1400 vs 1207 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.945 vs 7.907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.276 vs 3.432 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X4 810
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Phenom II X4 810 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1047 | 1283 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2003 | 2473 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 352 | 444 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1207 | 1400 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.314 | 0.587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.907 | 30.945 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.172 | 0.162 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.432 | 4.276 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.175 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Deneb | Yorkfield |
Launch date | February 2009 | August 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $116 | |
Place in performance rating | 2984 | 2987 |
Price now | $115.99 | $54.49 |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.94 | 22.69 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Processor Number | Q9650 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 258 mm | 214 mm2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 6144 KB (per die) |
L3 cache | 4096 KB (shared) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Transistor count | 758 million | 820 million |
Base frequency | 3.00 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
Maximum core temperature | 71.4°C | |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | LGA775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |