AMD A4-3300 vs AMD Phenom II X4 810

Comparative analysis of AMD A4-3300 and AMD Phenom II X4 810 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

AMD A4-3300

AMD Phenom II X4 810

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A4-3300

CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
9.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 71.876 vs 7.907

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	September 2011 vs February 2009
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm vs 45 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt vs 95 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	71.876 vs 7.907

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 810

2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
Around 4% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Around 8% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1047 vs 973
2.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2003 vs 942
Around 28% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 352 vs 274
2.7x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1207 vs 445
2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.314 vs 1.503
Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.172 vs 0.104
Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.432 vs 1.739

Specifications (specs)
Number of cores	4 vs 2
Maximum frequency	2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
L1 cache	128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB (per core)
L2 cache	512 KB (per core) vs 512 KB (per core)
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark	1047 vs 973
PassMark - CPU mark	2003 vs 942
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	352 vs 274
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	1207 vs 445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	3.314 vs 1.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.172 vs 0.104
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	3.432 vs 1.739

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A4-3300
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 810

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

973

1047

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

942

2003

Geekbench 4 - Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

274

352

Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

445

1207

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

1.503

3.314

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

71.876

7.907

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

0.104

0.172

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

1.739

3.432

Name	AMD A4-3300	AMD Phenom II X4 810
PassMark - Single thread mark	973	1047
PassMark - CPU mark	942	2003
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	274	352
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	445	1207
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	1.503	3.314
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	71.876	7.907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.104	0.172
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	3.657
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1.739	3.432
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	360

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD A4-3300	AMD Phenom II X4 810
Essentials
Architecture codename	Llano	Deneb
Launch date	September 2011	February 2009
Place in performance rating	3001	2985
Vertical segment	Desktop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$116
Price now		$115.99
Value for money (0-100)		7.94
Performance
64 bit support
Die size	228 mm	258 mm
L1 cache	128 KB (per core)	128 KB (per core)
L2 cache	512 KB (per core)	512 KB (per core)
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	45 nm
Maximum frequency	2.5 GHz	2.6 GHz
Number of cores	2	4
Transistor count	1178 million	758 million
L3 cache		4096 KB (shared)
Memory
Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3
Compatibility
Max number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Sockets supported	FM1	AM3
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	95 Watt
Virtualization
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)