AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+

Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) and AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)

• CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• Around 31% higher clock speed: 3.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 90 nm
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.288 vs 1.147
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 11.963 vs 4.278
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.208 vs 0.086

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+

• Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 89 Watt vs 125 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	4.288 1.147
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	11.963 4.278
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	0.208 0.086

Compare specifications (specs)