AMD Phenom II X4 B95 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X4 B95 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 B95
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.2 vs 0.587
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.167 vs 0.162
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | October 2009 vs August 2008 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.2 vs 0.587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.167 vs 0.162 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1283 vs 1242
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2479 vs 2411
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 444 vs 386
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1400 vs 1280
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 30.945 vs 7.417
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.175 vs 0.316
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.276 vs 3.481
Specifications (specs) | |
L2 cache | 6144 KB (per die) vs 512 KB (per core) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1283 vs 1242 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2479 vs 2411 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 444 vs 386 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1400 vs 1280 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.945 vs 7.417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.175 vs 0.316 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.276 vs 3.481 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X4 B95
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Phenom II X4 B95 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1242 | 1283 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2411 | 2479 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 386 | 444 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1280 | 1400 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.2 | 0.587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.417 | 30.945 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.167 | 0.162 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.316 | 1.175 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.481 | 4.276 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Phenom II X4 B95 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Deneb | Yorkfield |
Family | AMD Phenom | |
Launch date | October 2009 | August 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | |
OPN Tray | HDXB95WFK4DGM | |
Place in performance rating | 2984 | 2987 |
Price now | $72.95 | $54.49 |
Series | AMD Business Class - AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.95 | 22.69 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Processor Number | Q9650 | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3 GHz | 3.00 GHz |
Die size | 258 mm | 214 mm2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 6144 KB (per die) |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Transistor count | 758 million | 820 million |
Unlocked | ||
Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
Maximum core temperature | 71.4°C | |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | LGA775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |