AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) vs AMD Phenom X4 9100e
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and AMD Phenom X4 9100e processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
- Around 56% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 3x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 2028 vs 855
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 7615 vs 2584
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | April 2010 vs March 2008 |
Number of cores | 6 vs 4 |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 1.8 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) vs 2048 KB (shared) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2028 vs 855 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 7615 vs 2584 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9100e
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 125 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)
CPU 2: AMD Phenom X4 9100e
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
Name | AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) | AMD Phenom X4 9100e |
---|---|---|
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2028 | 855 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 7615 | 2584 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.563 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.293 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.569 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.726 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 734 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1279 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) | AMD Phenom X4 9100e | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Thuban | Agena |
Launch date | April 2010 | March 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 2410 | 2401 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 346 mm | 285 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | 2048 KB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 6 | 4 |
Transistor count | 904 million | 450 million |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | AM2+ |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 65 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |