Intel Celeron J4105 vs AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron J4105 and AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron J4105
- CPU is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 12.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 30 vs 15.951
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.281 vs 0.569
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 December 2017 vs April 2010 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 45 nm |
| L2 cache | 4 MB vs 512 KB (per core) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 125 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30 vs 15.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.281 vs 0.569 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
- Around 12% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.50 GHz
- 4.9x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 2028 vs 412
- 5.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 7615 vs 1365
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.563 vs 3.374
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.293 vs 0.261
- Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.726 vs 2.947
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 6 vs 4 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 2.50 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2028 vs 412 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 7615 vs 1365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.563 vs 3.374 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.293 vs 0.261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.726 vs 2.947 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron J4105
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron J4105 | AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1093 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2906 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 | 2028 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1365 | 7615 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.374 | 5.563 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30 | 15.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.261 | 0.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.281 | 0.569 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.947 | 5.726 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 722 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1384 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2229 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 722 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1384 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2229 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron J4105 | AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Gemini Lake | Thuban |
| Launch date | 11 December 2017 | April 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | |
| Place in performance rating | 2415 | 2410 |
| Price now | $107 | |
| Processor Number | J4105 | |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.27 | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.50 GHz | |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.50 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 4 | |
| Die size | 346 mm | |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | |
| L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
| Transistor count | 904 million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4/LPDDR4 upto 2400 MT/s | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x3185 | |
| Execution Units | 12 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 250 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 750 MHz | |
| Max video memory | 8 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 600 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| MIPI-DSI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 25mm x 24mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1090 | AM3 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 125 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | 105 deg C | |
Peripherals |
||
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Integrated Wireless | Intel® Wireless-AC MAC | |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 6 | |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | |
| Number of USB ports | 8 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 | |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron J4105 with others
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
AMDAthlon 64 FX-60
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
IntelCore i7-2600S
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
AMDAthlon II X2 270
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
IntelCeleron G1820
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
IntelCore i5-3340
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
AMDAthlon X2 450
