AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) vs Intel Celeron 220
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Intel Celeron 220 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 5 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 1
- Around 133% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 1.2 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 12x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 6x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Launch date | May 2010 vs October 2007 |
Number of cores | 6 vs 1 |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 1.2 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 512 KB |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 220
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 95 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
CPU 2: Intel Celeron 220
Name | AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) | Intel Celeron 220 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.563 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.293 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.569 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.726 | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 255 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 209 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) | Intel Celeron 220 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Thuban | Conroe |
Launch date | May 2010 | October 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 3250 | 3267 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Processor Number | 220 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 346 mm | 77 mm2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 6 | 1 |
Transistor count | 904 million | 105 million |
Base frequency | 1.20 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 533 MHz FSB | |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 533 MHz | |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C | |
Number of threads | 1 | |
VID voltage range | 1.0000V-1.3375V | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | PBGA479 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 19 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |