AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) vs AMD Phenom X4 9750 (125W)

Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and AMD Phenom X4 9750 (125W) processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

• CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
• Around 17% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 3x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 125 Watt
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.563 vs 2.562
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 15.951 vs 9.726
• Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.293 vs 0.148

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
CPU 2: AMD Phenom X4 9750 (125W)

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	5.563 2.562
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	15.951 9.726
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	0.293 0.148

Compare specifications (specs)