AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ EE
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE and AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ EE processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 2
- Around 33% higher clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 90 nm
- 3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1455 vs 876
- 5.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3781 vs 679
- 10.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.141 vs 0.599
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | April 2010 vs May 2006 |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 6 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 90 nm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 256 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 1024 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1455 vs 876 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3781 vs 679 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.141 vs 0.599 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ EE
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 125 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ EE
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ EE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1455 | 876 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3781 | 679 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 460 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1974 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.141 | 0.599 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.825 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.312 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.606 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.417 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ EE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Thuban | Windsor |
Launch date | April 2010 | May 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 2815 | 2825 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 346 mm | 220 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1024 KB |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Number of cores | 6 | 2 |
Transistor count | 904 million | 154 million |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | AM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 65 Watt |