AMD Phenom X4 9500 vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+

Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom X4 9500 and AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9500

  • CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 90 nm
  • 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 31% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 651 vs 498
  • Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4.363 vs 4.278
Specifications (specs)
Launch date November 2007 vs September 2006
Number of cores 4 vs 2
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm vs 90 nm
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) vs 256 KB
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) vs 1024 KB
Benchmarks
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 651 vs 498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4.363 vs 4.278

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+

  • Around 18% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
  • Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 89 Watt vs 95 Watt
  • Around 31% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 266 vs 203
  • 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.147 vs 0.396
  • 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.086 vs 0.03
Specifications (specs)
Maximum frequency 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 89 Watt vs 95 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 266 vs 203
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.147 vs 0.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.086 vs 0.03

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Phenom X4 9500
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+

Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
203
266
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
651
498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.396
1.147
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
4.363
4.278
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.03
0.086
Name AMD Phenom X4 9500 AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 203 266
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 651 498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.396 1.147
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4.363 4.278
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.03 0.086
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.188
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1.623

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Phenom X4 9500 AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+

Essentials

Architecture codename Agena Windsor
Launch date November 2007 September 2006
Place in performance rating 3311 3297
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop
Price now $53.09
Value for money (0-100) 7.68

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 285 mm 220 mm
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) 256 KB
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) 1024 KB
L3 cache 2048 KB (shared)
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm 90 nm
Maximum frequency 2.2 GHz 2.6 GHz
Number of cores 4 2
Transistor count 450 million 154 million

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported AM2+ AM2
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 95 Watt 89 Watt

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)