AMD Phenom X4 9600 BE vs Intel Celeron 2.10
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom X4 9600 BE and Intel Celeron 2.10 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Virtualization, Memory, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9600 BE
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
- Around 10% higher clock speed: 2.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 130 nm
- 64x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 16x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Launch date | December 2007 vs November 2002 |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 4 vs 1 |
Maximum frequency | 2.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 130 nm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 8 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 128 KB |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 2.10
- Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 55.5 Watt vs 95 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55.5 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom X4 9600 BE
CPU 2: Intel Celeron 2.10
Name | AMD Phenom X4 9600 BE | Intel Celeron 2.10 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.554 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.083 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.046 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.238 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.772 | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 0 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 244 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Phenom X4 9600 BE | Intel Celeron 2.10 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Agena | Northwood |
Launch date | December 2007 | November 2002 |
Place in performance rating | 3318 | 3348 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Series | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 285 mm | 131 mm2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 8 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 130 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 1 |
Transistor count | 450 million | 55 million |
Unlocked | ||
Base frequency | 2.10 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 400 MHz FSB | |
Maximum core temperature | 69°C | |
VID voltage range | 1.315V-1.525V | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM2+ | PPGA478 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 55.5 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 32-bit |