AMD Phenom X4 9750 (95W) vs AMD Athlon XP 1500+
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom X4 9750 (95W) and AMD Athlon XP 1500+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9750 (95W)
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
- Around 80% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 1.33 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 180 nm
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
| Launch date | March 2008 vs October 2001 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 1 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 1.33 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 180 nm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 256 KB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP 1500+
- Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 95 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom X4 9750 (95W)
CPU 2: AMD Athlon XP 1500+
| Name | AMD Phenom X4 9750 (95W) | AMD Athlon XP 1500+ |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.562 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 9.726 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.148 | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 251 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 167 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Phenom X4 9750 (95W) | AMD Athlon XP 1500+ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Agena | Palomino |
| Launch date | March 2008 | October 2001 |
| Place in performance rating | 3287 | 3282 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 285 mm | 150 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 180 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 450 million | 63 million |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | AM2+ | A |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 60 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
