AMD RX-216GD vs Intel Celeron N3050
Comparative analysis of AMD RX-216GD and Intel Celeron N3050 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD RX-216GD
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 138789% higher clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 2.16 GHz
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 745 vs 515
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 745 vs 515
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 October 2015 vs 1 April 2015 |
| Maximum frequency | 3000 MHz vs 2.16 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 745 vs 515 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 745 vs 515 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N3050
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 15 Watt
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1428 vs 430
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1428 vs 430
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2267 vs 1121
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2267 vs 1121
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| L2 cache | 2 MB vs 1 MB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 15 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1428 vs 430 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1428 vs 430 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2267 vs 1121 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2267 vs 1121 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD RX-216GD
CPU 2: Intel Celeron N3050
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD RX-216GD | Intel Celeron N3050 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 745 | 515 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 745 | 515 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 430 | 1428 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 430 | 1428 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1121 | 2267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1121 | 2267 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 552 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 586 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 186 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 339 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.169 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4.85 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.435 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.25 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.666 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD RX-216GD | Intel Celeron N3050 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Merlin Falcon | Braswell |
| Family | AMD R-Series | |
| Launch date | 21 October 2015 | 1 April 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 2587 | 2589 |
| Processor Number | RX-216GD | N3050 |
| Vertical segment | Embedded | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | |
| Price now | $119.42 | |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.17 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1600 MHz | 1.60 GHz |
| Die size | 1073 mm2 | |
| L1 cache | 160 KB | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 3000 MHz | 2.16 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1600, DDR4-1600 | DDR3L-1600 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 800 MHz | 320 MHz |
| Number of pipelines | 256 | |
| Processor graphics | Radeon R5 series | Intel HD Graphics |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Execution Units | 12 | |
| Graphics max frequency | 600 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 8 GB | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 12-15 Watt | |
| Package Size | micro-BGA | 25mm x 27mm |
| Sockets supported | BGA (FP4) | FCBGA1170 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4 W | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 3.0 | 2.0/3.0 |
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4/2x2/1x2 + 2x1/4x1 | |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD RX-216GD with others
AMDRX-216GD vs
IntelCeleron N2810
AMDRX-216GD vs
IntelCeleron N3050
AMDRX-216GD vs
IntelAtom Z3745D
