AMD RX-421BD vs Intel Celeron 3215U
Comparative analysis of AMD RX-421BD and Intel Celeron 3215U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD RX-421BD
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 199900% higher clock speed: 3400 MHz vs 1.7 GHz
- 2.5x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7025 vs 3485
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7025 vs 3485
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 October 2015 vs 1 June 2015 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3400 MHz vs 1.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 320 KB vs 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB vs 512 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7025 vs 3485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7025 vs 3485 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 3215U
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 84.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 679 vs 8
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2177 vs 1942
- 84.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 679 vs 8
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2177 vs 1942
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 679 vs 8 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2177 vs 1942 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 679 vs 8 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2177 vs 1942 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD RX-421BD
CPU 2: Intel Celeron 3215U
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD RX-421BD | Intel Celeron 3215U |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.817 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.518 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.189 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.608 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.623 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8 | 679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1942 | 2177 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7025 | 3485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8 | 679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1942 | 2177 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7025 | 3485 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1015 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1083 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 358 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 652 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD RX-421BD | Intel Celeron 3215U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Merlin Falcon | Broadwell |
| Family | AMD R-Series | |
| Launch date | 21 October 2015 | 1 June 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1721 | 1725 |
| Processor Number | RX-421BD | 3215U |
| Vertical segment | Embedded | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor 3000 Series | |
| Status | Launched | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2100 MHz | 1.70 GHz |
| Die size | 1073 mm2 | 82 mm |
| L1 cache | 320 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 3400 MHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | |
| Transistor count | 1300 Million | |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Supported memory types | DDR3-2133, DDR4-2400 | DDR3L 1333/1600 LPDDR3 1333/1600 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 800 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Number of pipelines | 512 | |
| Processor graphics | Radeon R7 series | Intel HD Graphics |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 850 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 850 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 12-35 Watt | |
| Package Size | micro-BGA | 40mm x 24mm x 1.3mm |
| Sockets supported | BGA (FP4) | FCBGA1168 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Configurable TDP-down | 10 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 600 MHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 3.0 | |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 12 | |
| PCIe configurations | 4x1 2x4 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD RX-421BD with others
AMDRX-421BD vs
IntelCore i3-4100M
AMDRX-421BD vs
IntelCeleron 3215U
AMDRX-421BD vs
IntelCeleron G3900E
AMDRX-421BD vs
AMDRX-425BB
AMDRX-421BD vs
AMDRyzen Embedded V1500B
AMDRX-421BD vs
AppleA11 Bionic
