AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs Intel Core i5-3470
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G and Intel Core i5-3470 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- Around 3% higher clock speed: 3.7 GHz vs 3.60 GHz
- Around 41% higher maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 67.4°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm FinFET vs 22 nm
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 77 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2047 vs 1937
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 6746 vs 4671
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 852 vs 734
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2736 vs 2396
- 8.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.581 vs 3.217
- 37x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 356.091 vs 9.637
- 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.276 vs 0.393
- 21.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.679 vs 1.821
- 25.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 136.274 vs 5.424
- 7.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10990 vs 1515
- 7.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10990 vs 1515
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 February 2018 vs 8 April 2012 |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Maximum frequency | 3.7 GHz vs 3.60 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 95°C vs 67.4°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm FinFET vs 22 nm |
| L1 cache | 384 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB vs 1024 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 77 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2047 vs 1937 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6746 vs 4671 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 852 vs 734 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2736 vs 2396 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.581 vs 3.217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 356.091 vs 9.637 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.276 vs 0.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.679 vs 1.821 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 136.274 vs 5.424 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10990 vs 1515 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10990 vs 1515 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-3470
- Around 50% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 61% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 2696 vs 1678
| Specifications (specs) | |
| L3 cache | 6144 KB vs 4 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2696 vs 1678 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-3470
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | Intel Core i5-3470 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2047 | 1937 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6746 | 4671 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 852 | 734 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2736 | 2396 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 1678 | 2696 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.581 | 3.217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 356.091 | 9.637 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.276 | 0.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.679 | 1.821 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 136.274 | 5.424 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2802 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3768 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10990 | 1515 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2802 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3768 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10990 | 1515 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | Intel Core i5-3470 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Zen | Ivy Bridge |
| Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | |
| Launch date | 12 February 2018 | 8 April 2012 |
| OPN PIB | YD2200C5FBBOX | |
| OPN Tray | YD2200C5M4MFB | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Place in performance rating | 330 | 2409 |
| Price now | $97.99 | $112.06 |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Value for money (0-100) | 22.31 | 17.60 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $184 | |
| Processor Number | i5-3470 | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.5 GHz | 3.20 GHz |
| Die size | 246 mm | 132.8 mm |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1024 KB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 6144 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm FinFET | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95°C | 67.4°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.7 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | |
| Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 4500 Million | |
| Unlocked | ||
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 67 °C | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2993 MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 1333/1600 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics max frequency | 1100 MHz | 1.1 GHz |
| iGPU core count | 8 | |
| Processor graphics | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 |
| Device ID | 0x152 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 46-65 Watt | |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | AM4 | FCLGA1155 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 77 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | Wraith Stealth | 2011D |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 x8 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| AMD VR Ready Processors | ||
| Enmotus FuzeDrive | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Ryzen 3 2200G with others
AMDRyzen 3 2200G vs
AMDRyzen 5 2400G
AMDRyzen 3 2200G vs
IntelCore i5-9500T
AMDRyzen 3 2200G vs
AMDRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
AMDRyzen 3 2200G vs
AMDRyzen 7 PRO 5750G
AMDRyzen 3 2200G vs
IntelCore i5-12600T
AMDRyzen 3 2200G vs
IntelCore i5-13400T
