AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs AMD A10-6800K
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G and AMD A10-6800K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Graphics API support, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
- Around 28% higher maximum core temperature: 95 °C vs 74°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 12 nm vs 32 nm SOI
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2330 vs 1597
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 9250 vs 3193
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 939 vs 542
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3657 vs 1494
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 July 2019 vs 4 June 2013 |
| Number of threads | 8 vs 4 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C vs 74°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 32 nm SOI |
| L1 cache | 384 KB vs 192 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2330 vs 1597 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 9250 vs 3193 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 939 vs 542 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3657 vs 1494 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A10-6800K
- Around 5% higher clock speed: 4.4 GHz vs 4.2 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
| Maximum frequency | 4.4 GHz vs 4.2 GHz |
| L2 cache | 4 MB vs 2 MB |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
CPU 2: AMD A10-6800K
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | AMD A10-6800K |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2330 | 1597 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 9250 | 3193 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 939 | 542 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3657 | 1494 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2394 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.893 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.547 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.209 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.604 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.801 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1267 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4136 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4604 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1267 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4136 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4604 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | AMD A10-6800K | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 | Richland |
| Family | Ryzen | AMD A-Series Processors |
| Launch date | 7 July 2019 | 4 June 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | $142 |
| OPN PIB | YD3400C5FHBOX | AD680KWOHLBOX |
| OPN Tray | YD3400C5M4MFH | AD680KWOA44HL |
| Place in performance rating | 1532 | 1508 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Series | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 3.7 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 32 nm SOI |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 74°C |
| Maximum frequency | 4.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 11 | |
| Number of threads | 8 | 4 |
| Unlocked | ||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 246 mm | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | |
| Transistor count | 1303 Million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2933 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 1400 MHz | |
| iGPU core count | 11 | 384 |
| Processor graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8670D |
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 844 MHz | |
| Number of pipelines | 384 | |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 45-65 Watt | |
| Sockets supported | AM4 | FM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | x8 | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Ryzen 5 3400G with others
AMDRyzen 5 3400G vs
AMDA9-9400 SoC
AMDRyzen 5 3400G vs
IntelCore i7-7700T
AMDRyzen 5 3400G vs
IntelPentium Silver J5005
AMDRyzen 5 3400G vs
AMDRyzen 5 2600
AMDRyzen 5 3400G vs
IntelCeleron G3930TE
AMDRyzen 5 3400G vs
AMDA8-7500
