AMD Ryzen 7 2700 vs AMD FX-4350

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 7 2700 and AMD FX-4350 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 7 2700

• CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
• 12 more threads: 16 vs 4
• Around 55% higher maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 61.10°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 12 nm FinFET vs 32 nm SOI
• 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 125 Watt
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2177 vs 1605
• 4.8x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 15679 vs 3285
• Around 64% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 940 vs 572
• 3.9x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 6255 vs 1589

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-4350

• Around 5% higher clock speed: 4.3 GHz vs 4.1 GHz

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 7 2700
CPU 2: AMD FX-4350

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2177 1605
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	15679 3285
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	940 572
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	6255 1589

Compare specifications (specs)