AMD Ryzen 9 3900X vs AMD PRO A10-8750B

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X and AMD PRO A10-8750B processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

  • Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
  • 8 more cores, run more applications at once: 12 vs 4
  • 20 more threads: 24 vs 4
  • Around 114900% higher clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 4 GHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2706 vs 1320
  • 11.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 32614 vs 2935
  • 2.9x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1276 vs 433
  • 9.7x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 12037 vs 1242
  • Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.575 vs 17.07
  • Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.745 vs 1.319
Specifications (specs)
Unlocked Unlocked vs Locked
Number of cores 12 vs 4
Number of threads 24 vs 4
Maximum frequency 4600 MHz vs 4 GHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 28 nm
L2 cache 6 MB vs 4 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 2706 vs 1320
PassMark - CPU mark 32614 vs 2935
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 1276 vs 433
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 12037 vs 1242
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 30.575 vs 17.07
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.745 vs 1.319

Reasons to consider the AMD PRO A10-8750B

  • Around 62% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 105 Watt
  • 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 221.069 vs 72.097
  • 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.369 vs 5.887
  • 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 88.743 vs 22.686
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 105 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 221.069 vs 72.097
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 25.369 vs 5.887
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 88.743 vs 22.686

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
CPU 2: AMD PRO A10-8750B

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
2706
1320
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
32614
2935
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
1276
433
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
12037
1242
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
30.575
17.07
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
72.097
221.069
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.745
1.319
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
5.887
25.369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
22.686
88.743
Name AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD PRO A10-8750B
PassMark - Single thread mark 2706 1320
PassMark - CPU mark 32614 2935
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 1276 433
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 12037 1242
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score 8575
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 30.575 17.07
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 72.097 221.069
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.745 1.319
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 5.887 25.369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 22.686 88.743
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1790
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 6033
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1790
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 6033

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD PRO A10-8750B

Essentials

Architecture codename Zen 2
Family Ryzen AMD PRO A-Series Processors
Launch date 7 July 2019
OPN PIB 100-100000023BOX
OPN Tray 100-000000023 AD875BYBI44JC
Place in performance rating 1029 1015
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop
OS Support Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit
Series AMD PRO A-Series A10 APU for Desktops

Performance

Base frequency 3800 MHz 3.6 GHz
L2 cache 6 MB 4 MB
L3 cache 64 MB
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 28 nm
Maximum frequency 4600 MHz 4 GHz
Number of cores 12 4
Number of threads 24 4
Unlocked
Compute Cores 12
Maximum core temperature 71.30°C
Number of GPU cores 8

Memory

Max memory channels 2 2
Supported memory types DDR4-3200
Supported memory frequency 2133 MHz

Compatibility

Sockets supported AM4 FM2+
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 105 Watt 65 Watt
Configurable TDP 45 Watt/65 Watt

Peripherals

PCI Express revision 4.0
PCIe configurations x16

Graphics

Enduro
Graphics max frequency 757 MHz
iGPU core count 512
Processor graphics AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Switchable graphics
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Codec Engine (VCE)

Graphics interfaces

DisplayPort
HDMI

Graphics API support

DirectX 12
Vulkan

Advanced Technologies

AMD App Acceleration
AMD Elite Experiences
AMD HD3D technology
AMD Mantle API
DualGraphics
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
FreeSync
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Out-of-band client management
PowerGating
PowerNow
PowerTune
RAID
System Image Stability
TrueAudio

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
IOMMU 2.0