AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS vs Apple A17 Pro
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS and Apple A17 Pro processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Graphics. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 6
- 10 more threads: 16 vs 6
- Around 38% higher clock speed: 5.2 GHz vs 3.78 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 29891 vs 12243
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 Dec 2023 vs Sep 2023 |
| Number of cores | 8 vs 6 |
| Number of threads | 16 vs 6 |
| Maximum frequency | 5.2 GHz vs 3.78 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 256 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 29891 vs 12243 |
Reasons to consider the Apple A17 Pro
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 3 nm vs 4 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 4544 vs 3850
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 3 nm vs 4 nm |
| L2 cache | 16 MB vs 1 MB (per core) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 4544 vs 3850 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
CPU 2: Apple A17 Pro
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS | Apple A17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 3850 | 4544 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 29891 | 12243 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS | Apple A17 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 6 Dec 2023 | Sep 2023 |
| Place in performance rating | 185 | 142 |
| Processor Number | APL1V02 | |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 4 GHz | 2.02 GHz |
| Die size | 178 mm² | |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 5.2 GHz | 3.78 GHz |
| Number of cores | 8 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 16 | 6 |
| Transistor count | 25,000 million | 19 billion |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | LPDDR5-6400 |
| Max memory channels | 1 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB | |
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 35-54 Watt | |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Sockets supported | FP8 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCIe configurations | Gen 4, 20 Lanes, (CPU only) | |
Graphics |
||
| Execution Units | 20 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 1398 MHz | |
| iGPU core count | 6 | |
