AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Intel Celeron G3920
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Intel Celeron G3920 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Peripherals, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 51 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1908 vs 1781
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 6677 vs 2358
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1632 vs 766
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1632 vs 766
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 2091
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 2091
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | February 2018 vs September 2015 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 51 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1908 vs 1781 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6677 vs 2358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1632 vs 766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1632 vs 766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 vs 2091 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 vs 2091 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron G3920
- Around 45% higher clock speed: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz
- 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1680 vs 1514
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1680 vs 1514
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz |
| L3 cache | 4096 KB (shared) vs 2048 KB (shared) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1680 vs 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1680 vs 1514 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
CPU 2: Intel Celeron G3920
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B | Intel Celeron G3920 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1908 | 1781 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6677 | 2358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1632 | 766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1632 | 766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 | 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 | 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | 2091 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | 2091 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 3432 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 5672 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B | Intel Celeron G3920 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Zen | Skylake |
| Launch date | February 2018 | September 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1290 | 1307 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $60 | |
| Price now | $62.45 | |
| Processor Number | G3920 | |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.69 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 210 mm | 150 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | 4096 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 4950 million | 1400 million |
| Base frequency | 2.90 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | |
| Number of threads | 2 | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V |
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 51 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1151 | |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x1902 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 950 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 950 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 64 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 510 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
| Max resolution over VGA | N / A | |
| Max resolution over WiDi | 1080p | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B with others
AMDRyzen Embedded V1605B vs
IntelCeleron G3920
AMDRyzen Embedded V1605B vs
AMDAthlon X4 750
AMDRyzen Embedded V1605B vs
AMDAthlon 240GE
AMDRyzen Embedded V1605B vs
AMDAthlon 220GE
AMDRyzen Embedded V1605B vs
IntelCore i5-4690S
AMDRyzen Embedded V1605B vs
IntelCeleron G4930
