AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 16 vs 14
- Around 14% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 14% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
| Number of cores | 16 vs 14 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 512 KB (per core) |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Zen | Zen |
| Launch date | July 2017 | July 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 213 mm | 213 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32768 KB | 32768 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 14 | 16 |
| Transistor count | 9600 million | 9600 million |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | SP3r2 | SP3r2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 155 Watt | 155 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
