AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX vs AMD EPYC 9274F
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and AMD EPYC 9274F processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
- CPU is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- Around 23% higher clock speed: 5.3 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
- 1048576x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 524288x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 4004 vs 3371
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 Oct 2023 vs 10 Nov 2022 |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Maximum frequency | 5.3 GHz vs 4.3 GHz |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) vs 1MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) vs 256MB (shared) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 4004 vs 3371 |
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 9274F
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 320 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 112943 vs 81819
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 112943 vs 81819 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
CPU 2: AMD EPYC 9274F
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX | AMD EPYC 9274F |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 4004 | 3371 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 81819 | 112943 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX | AMD EPYC 9274F | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 19 Oct 2023 | 10 Nov 2022 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2649 | $3060 |
| Place in performance rating | 32 | 24 |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 4.2 GHz | 4.05 GHz |
| Die size | 4x 71 mm² | 8x 72 mm² |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 256MB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 5.3 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 24 | 24 |
| Number of threads | 48 | 48 |
| Transistor count | 26,280 million | 52,560 million |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5-4800 MHz, Twelve-channel |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Sockets supported | sTR5 | SP5 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 320 Watt |
| Configurable TDP | 320-400 Watt | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 128 Lanes, (CPU only) | Gen 5, 128 Lanes, (CPU only) |
