Intel Atom x5-Z8300 vs Intel Celeron N2840
Comparative analysis of Intel Atom x5-Z8300 and Intel Celeron N2840 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom x5-Z8300
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 814 vs 587
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 490 vs 370
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.82 vs 1.114
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 8.772 vs 6.194
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.093 vs 0.074
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.16 vs 0.939
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 814 vs 587 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 490 vs 370 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.82 vs 1.114 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.772 vs 6.194 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.093 vs 0.074 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.16 vs 0.939 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N2840
- Around 40% higher clock speed: 2.58 GHz vs 1.84 GHz
- Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90°C
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 672 vs 455
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 207 vs 157
- 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.793 vs 0.339
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1383 vs 1230
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1383 vs 1230
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.58 GHz vs 1.84 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 90°C |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 672 vs 455 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 207 vs 157 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.793 vs 0.339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1383 vs 1230 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1383 vs 1230 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Atom x5-Z8300
CPU 2: Intel Celeron N2840
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Atom x5-Z8300 | Intel Celeron N2840 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 455 | 672 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 814 | 587 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 157 | 207 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 490 | 370 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.82 | 1.114 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.772 | 6.194 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.093 | 0.074 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.339 | 1.793 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.16 | 0.939 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 371 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 678 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1230 | 1383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 371 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 678 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1230 | 1383 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Atom x5-Z8300 | Intel Celeron N2840 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Cherry Trail | Bay Trail |
| Launch date | Q2'15 | 22 May 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 3108 | 3109 |
| Processor Number | x5-Z8300 | N2840 |
| Series | Intel® Atom™ Processor X Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.44 GHz | 2.16 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 1.84 GHz | 2.58 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| L1 cache | 112 KB | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | 21.32 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-RS 1600 | DDR3L 1333 |
Graphics |
||
| Execution Units | 12 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | 311 MHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 500 MHz | 792 MHz |
| Max video memory | 2 GB | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 792 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 2 |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 1920x1080 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 17mm x 17mm | 25mm x 27mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 2 W | 4.5 W |
| Sockets supported | UTFCBGA592 | FCBGA1170 |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 1 | 4 |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x1 | 1x4 |
| USB revision | 3.0 | 3.0 and 2.0 |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Atom x5-Z8300 with others
IntelAtom x5-Z8300 vs
IntelCore i3-2310M
IntelAtom x5-Z8300 vs
IntelPentium B950
IntelAtom x5-Z8300 vs
IntelCeleron N2840
