Intel Celeron 1007U vs Intel Core i7-2675QM

Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron 1007U and Intel Core i7-2675QM processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).

Intel Celeron 1007U

Intel Core i7-2675QM

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 1007U

CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105 °C vs 100 °C
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 32 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 16 GB
2.6x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 45 Watt
Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 72.255 vs 54.11
2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.443 vs 1.484

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	21 January 2013 vs 2 November 2011
Maximum core temperature	105 °C vs 100 °C
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 32 nm
Maximum memory size	32 GB vs 16 GB
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	17 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	72.255 vs 54.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	3.443 vs 1.484

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-2675QM

2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
6 more threads: 8 vs 2
Around 107% higher clock speed: 3.10 GHz vs 1.5 GHz
2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
3x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
Around 69% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1302 vs 772
4.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3852 vs 839
Around 64% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 477 vs 290
3.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1678 vs 534
Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.517 vs 1.858
Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.801 vs 3.706

Specifications (specs)
Number of cores	4 vs 2
Number of threads	8 vs 2
Maximum frequency	3.10 GHz vs 1.5 GHz
L1 cache	256 KB vs 128 KB
L2 cache	1024 KB vs 512 KB
L3 cache	6144 KB vs 2048 KB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark	1302 vs 772
PassMark - CPU mark	3852 vs 839
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	477 vs 290
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	1678 vs 534
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	3.517 vs 1.858
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	3.801 vs 3.706

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Celeron 1007U
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-2675QM

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

772

1302

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

839

3852

Geekbench 4 - Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

290

477

Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

534

1678

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

1.858

3.517

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

72.255

54.11

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

3.443

1.484

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

3.706

3.801

Name	Intel Celeron 1007U	Intel Core i7-2675QM
PassMark - Single thread mark	772	1302
PassMark - CPU mark	839	3852
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	290	477
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	534	1678
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	1.858	3.517
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	72.255	54.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	3.443	1.484
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	3.706	3.801
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1983
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1983
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.409

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Celeron 1007U	Intel Core i7-2675QM
Essentials
Architecture codename	Ivy Bridge	Sandy Bridge
Launch date	21 January 2013	2 November 2011
Launch price (MSRP)	$86
Place in performance rating	2695	2688
Price now	$184.99
Processor Number	1007U	i7-2675QM
Series	Intel® Celeron® Processor 1000 Series	Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status	Launched	Launched
Value for money (0-100)	2.22
Vertical segment	Mobile	Mobile
Performance
64 bit support
Base frequency	1.50 GHz	2.20 GHz
Bus Speed	5 GT/s DMI	5 GT/s DMI
Die size	94 mm	216 mm
L1 cache	128 KB	256 KB
L2 cache	512 KB	1024 KB
L3 cache	2048 KB	6144 KB
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm	32 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	105 °C
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	100 °C
Maximum frequency	1.5 GHz	3.10 GHz
Number of cores	2	4
Number of threads	2	8
Transistor count	1400 million	995 Million
Memory
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	21.3 GB/s
Maximum memory size	32 GB	16 GB
Supported memory types	DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600	DDR3 1066/1333
Graphics
Graphics base frequency	350 MHz	650 MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency	1.00 GHz	1.20 GHz
Graphics max frequency	1 GHz	1.2 GHz
Intel® Clear Video HD technology
Intel® Clear Video technology
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Processor graphics	Intel HD Graphics	Intel® HD Graphics 3000
Device ID		0x116
Graphics interfaces
CRT
DisplayPort
eDP
HDMI
Number of displays supported	3	2
SDVO
Wireless Display (WiDi) support
Compatibility
Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Package Size	31mm x 24mm	31.0mm x 24.0mm (BGA1224)
Sockets supported	FCBGA1023	FCBGA1224
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	17 Watt	45 Watt
Peripherals
Max number of PCIe lanes	16	16
PCI Express revision	2.0	2.0
PCIe configurations	1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4	1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4
Security & Reliability
Anti-Theft technology
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)
Intel® Identity Protection technology
Advanced Technologies
4G WiMAX Wireless
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Flexible Display interface (FDI)
Idle States
Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	Intel® AVX
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Fast Memory Access
Intel® Flex Memory Access
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® My WiFi technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Thermal Monitoring
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Virtualization
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)