Intel Celeron 1007U vs Intel Core i7-2675QM
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron 1007U and Intel Core i7-2675QM processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 1007U
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105 °C vs 100 °C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 16 GB
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 72.255 vs 54.11
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.443 vs 1.484
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 January 2013 vs 2 November 2011 |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C vs 100 °C |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 16 GB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 72.255 vs 54.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.443 vs 1.484 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-2675QM
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 6 more threads: 8 vs 2
- Around 107% higher clock speed: 3.10 GHz vs 1.5 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 3x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1299 vs 773
- 4.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3856 vs 840
- Around 64% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 477 vs 290
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1678 vs 534
- Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.517 vs 1.858
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.801 vs 3.706
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Number of threads | 8 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 3.10 GHz vs 1.5 GHz |
L1 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 512 KB |
L3 cache | 6144 KB vs 2048 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1299 vs 773 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3856 vs 840 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 477 vs 290 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1678 vs 534 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.517 vs 1.858 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.801 vs 3.706 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron 1007U
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-2675QM
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Celeron 1007U | Intel Core i7-2675QM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 773 | 1299 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 840 | 3856 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 290 | 477 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 534 | 1678 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.858 | 3.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 72.255 | 54.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.443 | 1.484 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.706 | 3.801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1983 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1983 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.409 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Celeron 1007U | Intel Core i7-2675QM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge | Sandy Bridge |
Launch date | 21 January 2013 | 2 November 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | |
Place in performance rating | 2694 | 2687 |
Price now | $184.99 | |
Processor Number | 1007U | i7-2675QM |
Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor 1000 Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Launched | Launched |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.22 | |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 1.50 GHz | 2.20 GHz |
Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 5 GT/s DMI |
Die size | 94 mm | 216 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1024 KB |
L3 cache | 2048 KB | 6144 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 32 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 105 °C | |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 100 °C |
Maximum frequency | 1.5 GHz | 3.10 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
Number of threads | 2 | 8 |
Transistor count | 1400 million | 995 Million |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 21.3 GB/s |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 16 GB |
Supported memory types | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | DDR3 1066/1333 |
Graphics |
||
Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 650 MHz |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | 1.20 GHz |
Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 3000 |
Device ID | 0x116 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
CRT | ||
DisplayPort | ||
eDP | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 |
SDVO | ||
Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 31mm x 24mm | 31.0mm x 24.0mm (BGA1224) |
Sockets supported | FCBGA1023 | FCBGA1224 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 45 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 |
Security & Reliability |
||
Anti-Theft technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® AVX |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |