Intel Celeron E3400 vs AMD Athlon 64 3400+
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron E3400 and AMD Athlon 64 3400+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron E3400
- CPU is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- Around 8% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 130 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 37% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 89 Watt
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1015 vs 652
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 883 vs 545
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | January 2010 vs January 2001 |
| Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 130 nm |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB (shared) vs 512 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 89 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1015 vs 652 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 883 vs 545 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron E3400
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 3400+
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron E3400 | AMD Athlon 64 3400+ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1015 | 652 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 883 | 545 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 301 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 510 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron E3400 | AMD Athlon 64 3400+ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Wolfdale | Clawhammer |
| Launch date | January 2010 | January 2001 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $76 | |
| Place in performance rating | 2752 | 2778 |
| Price now | $75.47 | |
| Processor Number | E3400 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 5.63 | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.60 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | |
| Die size | 82 mm | 193 mm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB (shared) | 512 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 228 million | 105 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | LGA775 | 754 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 89 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||