Intel Celeron E3400 vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron E3400 and AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron E3400
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 90 nm
- Around 37% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 89 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 301 vs 279
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 510 vs 497
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | January 2010 vs December 2006 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 90 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 89 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 301 vs 279 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 510 vs 497 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+
- Around 8% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 909 vs 883
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1018 vs 1015 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 909 vs 883 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron E3400
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron E3400 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1015 | 1018 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 883 | 909 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 301 | 279 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 510 | 497 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron E3400 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Wolfdale | Windsor |
| Launch date | January 2010 | December 2006 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $76 | |
| Place in performance rating | 2752 | 2762 |
| Price now | $75.47 | $149.95 |
| Processor Number | E3400 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 5.63 | 2.91 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.60 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | |
| Die size | 82 mm | 220 mm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB (shared) | 1024 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 228 million | 227 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | LGA775 | AM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 89 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||