Intel Celeron E3400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E4700
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron E3400 and Intel Core 2 Duo E4700 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron E3400
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher maximum core temperature: 74.1°C vs 73.3°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1001 vs 990
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | January 2010 vs March 2008 |
Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C vs 73.3°C |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1001 vs 990 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E4700
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 908 vs 869
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 311 vs 301
Specifications (specs) | |
L2 cache | 2048 KB vs 1024 KB (shared) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 908 vs 869 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 311 vs 301 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 512 vs 510 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron E3400
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E4700
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
Name | Intel Celeron E3400 | Intel Core 2 Duo E4700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1001 | 990 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 869 | 908 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 301 | 311 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 510 | 512 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Celeron E3400 | Intel Core 2 Duo E4700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Wolfdale | Conroe |
Launch date | January 2010 | March 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $76 | |
Place in performance rating | 2753 | 2756 |
Price now | $75.47 | $26.99 |
Processor Number | E3400 | E4700 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.63 | 16.19 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.60 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
Die size | 82 mm | 111 mm2 |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB (shared) | 2048 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C | 73.3°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Transistor count | 228 million | 167 million |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | 0.8500V-1.5V |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | LGA775 | PLGA775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
FSB parity | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |