Intel Celeron J1900 vs Intel Core i7-620M
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron J1900 and Intel Core i7-620M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron J1900
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 75% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.068 vs 0.513
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 November 2013 vs 10 January 2010 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
L1 cache | 224 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB vs 512 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.068 vs 0.513 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-620M
- Around 38% higher clock speed: 3.33 GHz vs 2.42 GHz
- Around 96% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1280 vs 652
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1974 vs 1151
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 452 vs 210
- Around 38% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 947 vs 686
- Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 22.188 vs 11.336
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.15 vs 0.139
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.762 vs 0.508
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.197 vs 1.753
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 3.33 GHz vs 2.42 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1280 vs 652 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1974 vs 1151 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 452 vs 210 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 947 vs 686 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 22.188 vs 11.336 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.15 vs 0.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.762 vs 0.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.197 vs 1.753 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron J1900
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-620M
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Celeron J1900 | Intel Core i7-620M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 652 | 1280 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1151 | 1974 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 210 | 452 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 686 | 947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.068 | 0.513 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 11.336 | 22.188 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.139 | 0.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.508 | 0.762 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.753 | 2.197 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1007 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1007 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Celeron J1900 | Intel Core i7-620M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Bay Trail | Arrandale |
Launch date | 1 November 2013 | 10 January 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $82 | $332 |
Place in performance rating | 3166 | 2993 |
Processor Number | J1900 | i7-620M |
Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Launched | Launched |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Mobile |
Price now | $110.01 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.29 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.00 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
L1 cache | 224 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 32 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 105°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.42 GHz | 3.33 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
Bus Speed | 2.5 GT/s DMI | |
Die size | 81 mm2 | |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 2500 MHz | |
L3 cache | 4096 KB | |
Transistor count | 382 million | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Supported memory types | DDR3L 1333 | DDR3 800/1066 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | |
Graphics |
||
Graphics base frequency | 688 MHz | 500 MHz |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 854 MHz | 766 MHz |
Graphics max frequency | 854 MHz | 766 MHz |
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics |
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
Number of displays supported | 2 | 2 |
Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 25mm X 27mm | rPGA 37.5mmx 37.5mm, BGA 34mmx28mm |
Sockets supported | FCBGA1170 | BGA1288, PGA988 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | 16 |
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
PCIe configurations | X4, X2, X1 | 1x16 |
Security & Reliability |
||
Anti-Theft technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | 36-bit |
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |