Intel Celeron J4105 vs Intel Celeron N3150
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron J4105 and Intel Celeron N3150 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron J4105
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher clock speed: 2.50 GHz vs 2.08 GHz
- Around 17% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 90°C
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1085 vs 564
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2891 vs 1178
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 412 vs 192
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1365 vs 655
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 30 vs 8.191
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.947 vs 1.375
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 722 vs 501
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1384 vs 875
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2229 vs 1471
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 722 vs 501
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1384 vs 875
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2229 vs 1471
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 December 2017 vs 1 April 2015 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.50 GHz vs 2.08 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 90°C |
| L2 cache | 4 MB vs 2 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1085 vs 564 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2891 vs 1178 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 vs 192 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1365 vs 655 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30 vs 8.191 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.947 vs 1.375 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 722 vs 501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1384 vs 875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2229 vs 1471 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 722 vs 501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1384 vs 875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2229 vs 1471 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N3150
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 10 Watt
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.724 vs 3.374
- Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.484 vs 0.261
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 5.104 vs 1.281
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 10 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.724 vs 3.374 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.484 vs 0.261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.104 vs 1.281 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron J4105
CPU 2: Intel Celeron N3150
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron J4105 | Intel Celeron N3150 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1085 | 564 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2891 | 1178 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 | 192 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1365 | 655 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.374 | 4.724 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30 | 8.191 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.261 | 0.484 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.281 | 5.104 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.947 | 1.375 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 722 | 501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1384 | 875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2229 | 1471 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 722 | 501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1384 | 875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2229 | 1471 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron J4105 | Intel Celeron N3150 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Gemini Lake | Braswell |
| Launch date | 11 December 2017 | 1 April 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $107 |
| Place in performance rating | 2434 | 2766 |
| Price now | $107 | |
| Processor Number | J4105 | N3150 |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.27 | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.50 GHz | 1.60 GHz |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 90°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.50 GHz | 2.08 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR4/LPDDR4 upto 2400 MT/s | DDR3L-1600 |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x3185 | |
| Execution Units | 12 | 12 |
| Graphics base frequency | 250 MHz | 320 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 750 MHz | |
| Max video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Processor graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 600 | Intel HD Graphics |
| Graphics max frequency | 640 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| MIPI-DSI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | Yes |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | Yes |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 25mm x 24mm | 25mm x 27mm |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1090 | FCBGA1170 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | 105 deg C | |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4 W | |
Peripherals |
||
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Integrated Wireless | Intel® Wireless-AC MAC | |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 6 | 4 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | 8 | 5 |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 | 1x4/2x2/1x2 + 2x1/4x1 |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | 2 |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | 2.0/3.0 |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron J4105 with others
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
IntelCore i5-2500K
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
IntelCeleron G1820
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
AMDFX-8370
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
AMDAthlon 5350
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
IntelCore i5-3340
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
AMDAthlon X2 450
