Intel Celeron J4105 versus Intel Celeron N3150
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Celeron J4105 et Intel Celeron N3150 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Celeron J4105
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 2 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 20% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.50 GHz versus 2.08 GHz
- Environ 17% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 105°C versus 90°C
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1085 versus 564
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2891 versus 1178
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 412 versus 192
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1365 versus 655
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 30 versus 8.191
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.947 versus 1.375
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 722 versus 501
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1384 versus 875
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2229 versus 1471
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 722 versus 501
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1384 versus 875
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2229 versus 1471
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 versus 1 April 2015 |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.50 GHz versus 2.08 GHz |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105°C versus 90°C |
| Cache L2 | 4 MB versus 2 MB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1085 versus 564 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2891 versus 1178 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 versus 192 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1365 versus 655 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30 versus 8.191 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.947 versus 1.375 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 722 versus 501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1384 versus 875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2229 versus 1471 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 722 versus 501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1384 versus 875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2229 versus 1471 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Celeron N3150
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 6 Watt versus 10 Watt
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.724 versus 3.374
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.484 versus 0.261
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 5.104 versus 1.281
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt versus 10 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.724 versus 3.374 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.484 versus 0.261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.104 versus 1.281 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Celeron J4105
CPU 2: Intel Celeron N3150
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Celeron J4105 | Intel Celeron N3150 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1085 | 564 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2891 | 1178 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 | 192 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1365 | 655 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.374 | 4.724 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30 | 8.191 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.261 | 0.484 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.281 | 5.104 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.947 | 1.375 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 722 | 501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1384 | 875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2229 | 1471 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 722 | 501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1384 | 875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2229 | 1471 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Celeron J4105 | Intel Celeron N3150 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Gemini Lake | Braswell |
| Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 | 1 April 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $107 | $107 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2434 | 2766 |
| Prix maintenant | $107 | |
| Processor Number | J4105 | N3150 |
| Série | Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.27 | |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 1.50 GHz | 1.60 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 4 MB | 2 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105°C | 90°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.50 GHz | 2.08 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4/LPDDR4 upto 2400 MT/s | DDR3L-1600 |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x3185 | |
| Unités d’éxécution | 12 | 12 |
| Graphics base frequency | 250 MHz | 320 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 750 MHz | |
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® UHD Graphics 600 | Intel HD Graphics |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 640 MHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| MIPI-DSI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | Yes |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | Yes |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 25mm x 24mm | 25mm x 27mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCBGA1090 | FCBGA1170 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | 105 deg C | |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4 W | |
Périphériques |
||
| LAN integré | ||
| Integrated Wireless | Intel® Wireless-AC MAC | |
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 6 | 4 |
| Nombre maximale des ports SATA 6 Gb/s | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre des ports USB | 8 | 5 |
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 | 1x4/2x2/1x2 + 2x1/4x1 |
| Nombre total des ports SATA | 2 | 2 |
| UART | ||
| Révision USB | 2.0/3.0 | 2.0/3.0 |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Technologie Intel® Smart Response | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Technologie Intel® Rapid Storage (RST) | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Celeron J4105 avec des autres
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
IntelCore i5-2500K
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
IntelCeleron G1820
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
AMDFX-8370
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
AMDAthlon 5350
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
IntelCore i5-3340
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
AMDAthlon X2 450
