Intel Celeron N2920 vs Intel Pentium N3520
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron N2920 and Intel Pentium N3520 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N2920
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.016 vs 0.975
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1385 vs 1307
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1385 vs 1307
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.86 vs 0.517
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.016 vs 0.975 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1385 vs 1307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1385 vs 1307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.86 vs 0.517 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium N3520
- Around 21% higher clock speed: 2.42 GHz vs 2.00 GHz
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 663 vs 552
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1140 vs 950
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 9.555 vs 7.868
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.141 vs 0.1
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.789 vs 1.508
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2.42 GHz vs 2.00 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 663 vs 552 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1140 vs 950 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 9.555 vs 7.868 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.141 vs 0.1 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.789 vs 1.508 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron N2920
CPU 2: Intel Pentium N3520
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Celeron N2920 | Intel Pentium N3520 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 552 | 663 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 950 | 1140 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.016 | 0.975 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.868 | 9.555 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.1 | 0.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.508 | 1.789 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1385 | 1307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1385 | 1307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.86 | 0.517 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 200 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 672 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Celeron N2920 | Intel Pentium N3520 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Bay Trail | Bay Trail |
Launch date | 1 December 2013 | 1 December 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $161 |
Place in performance rating | 3077 | 3137 |
Processor Number | N2920 | N3520 |
Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor N Series |
Status | Discontinued | Launched |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 1.86 GHz | 2.17 GHz |
L1 cache | 224 KB | 224 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 22 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 105°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.00 GHz | 2.42 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
VID voltage range | 0.40V – 1.14V | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Supported memory types | DDR3L 1066 | DDR3L 1333 |
Graphics |
||
Graphics base frequency | 313 MHz | 313 MHz |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 844 MHz | 854 MHz |
Graphics max frequency | 844 MHz | 854 MHz |
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics |
Graphics interfaces |
||
Number of displays supported | 2 | 2 |
Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | 25mm x 27mm |
Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4.5 W | 4.5 W |
Sockets supported | FCBGA1170 | FCBGA1170 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 7.5 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | 4 |
Number of USB ports | 5 | 5 |
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | 2 |
USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | 3.0 and 2.0 |
Security & Reliability |
||
Anti-Theft technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Smart Connect | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |