Intel Celeron N2920 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron N2920 and Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N2920
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 75% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 7.5 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.016 vs 0.31
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.1 vs 0.097
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.86 vs 0.621
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 December 2013 vs 1 January 2009 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 45 nm |
L1 cache | 224 KB vs 128 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7.5 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.016 vs 0.31 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.1 vs 0.097 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.86 vs 0.621 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
- Around 46% higher clock speed: 2.92 GHz vs 2.00 GHz
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1236 vs 552
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1216 vs 950
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 24.171 vs 7.868
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.253 vs 1.508
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2.92 GHz vs 2.00 GHz |
L2 cache | 6134 KB vs 2 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1236 vs 552 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1216 vs 950 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.171 vs 7.868 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.253 vs 1.508 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron N2920
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Celeron N2920 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 552 | 1236 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 950 | 1216 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.016 | 0.31 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.868 | 24.171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.1 | 0.097 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.508 | 2.253 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1385 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1385 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.86 | 0.621 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 362 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 696 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Celeron N2920 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Bay Trail | Penryn |
Launch date | 1 December 2013 | 1 January 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $530 |
Place in performance rating | 3071 | 3062 |
Processor Number | N2920 | T9800 |
Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Price now | $423.89 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.40 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 1.86 GHz | 2.93 GHz |
L1 cache | 224 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 6134 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 105°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.00 GHz | 2.92 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | |
Die size | 107 mm2 | |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | |
Transistor count | 410 million | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
Supported memory types | DDR3L 1066 | |
Graphics |
||
Graphics base frequency | 313 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 844 MHz | |
Graphics max frequency | 844 MHz | |
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
Number of displays supported | 2 | |
Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | 35mm x 35mm |
Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4.5 W | |
Sockets supported | FCBGA1170 | PGA478, BGA479 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 35 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | |
Number of USB ports | 5 | |
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Anti-Theft technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Smart Connect | ||
FSB parity | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |