Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.33 GHz
- Around 4% higher maximum core temperature: 74.1°C vs 71.4°C
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1108 vs 998
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 377 vs 320
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 19.088 vs 16.702
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | October 2008 vs August 2008 |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 2.33 GHz |
Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C vs 71.4°C |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1108 vs 998 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 377 vs 320 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 19.088 vs 16.702 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1783 vs 1027
- Around 56% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1006 vs 646
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.501 vs 0.307
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.111 vs 0.081
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.035 vs 0.639
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.688 vs 2.262
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
L1 cache | 256 KB vs 64 KB |
L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 3072 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1783 vs 1027 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1006 vs 646 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.501 vs 0.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.111 vs 0.081 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.035 vs 0.639 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.688 vs 2.262 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1108 | 998 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1027 | 1783 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 377 | 320 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 646 | 1006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.307 | 0.501 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 19.088 | 16.702 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.081 | 0.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.639 | 1.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.262 | 3.688 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Wolfdale | Yorkfield |
Launch date | October 2008 | August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 3116 | 3117 |
Price now | $28.99 | $22.99 |
Processor Number | E7400 | Q8200 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.04 | 36.05 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.80 GHz | 2.33 GHz |
Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 1333 MHz FSB |
Die size | 82 mm2 | 164 mm2 |
L1 cache | 64 KB | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 3072 KB | 4096 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | 71 °C |
Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C | 71.4°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.33 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
Transistor count | 228 million | 456 million |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | 0.8500V-1.3625V |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
Sockets supported | LGA775 | LGA775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |