Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200

Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E7400

  • CPU is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
  • Around 20% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.33 GHz
  • Around 4% higher maximum core temperature: 74.1°C vs 71.4°C
  • Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1108 vs 998
  • Around 18% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 377 vs 320
  • Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 19.088 vs 16.702
Specifications (specs)
Launch date October 2008 vs August 2008
Maximum frequency 2.8 GHz vs 2.33 GHz
Maximum core temperature 74.1°C vs 71.4°C
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 1108 vs 998
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 377 vs 320
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 19.088 vs 16.702

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200

  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
  • 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 74% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1783 vs 1027
  • Around 56% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1006 vs 646
  • Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.501 vs 0.307
  • Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.111 vs 0.081
  • Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.035 vs 0.639
  • Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.688 vs 2.262
Specifications (specs)
Number of cores 4 vs 2
L1 cache 256 KB vs 64 KB
L2 cache 4096 KB vs 3072 KB
Benchmarks
PassMark - CPU mark 1783 vs 1027
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1006 vs 646
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.501 vs 0.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.111 vs 0.081
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 1.035 vs 0.639
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 3.688 vs 2.262

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1108
998
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1027
1783
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
377
320
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
646
1006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.307
0.501
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
19.088
16.702
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.081
0.111
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.639
1.035
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
2.262
3.688
Name Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
PassMark - Single thread mark 1108 998
PassMark - CPU mark 1027 1783
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 377 320
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 646 1006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.307 0.501
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 19.088 16.702
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.081 0.111
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.639 1.035
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2.262 3.688

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200

Essentials

Architecture codename Wolfdale Yorkfield
Launch date October 2008 August 2008
Place in performance rating 3116 3117
Price now $28.99 $22.99
Processor Number E7400 Q8200
Series Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status Discontinued Discontinued
Value for money (0-100) 18.04 36.05
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop

Performance

64 bit support
Base frequency 2.80 GHz 2.33 GHz
Bus Speed 1066 MHz FSB 1333 MHz FSB
Die size 82 mm2 164 mm2
L1 cache 64 KB 256 KB
L2 cache 3072 KB 4096 KB
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm 45 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 74 °C 71 °C
Maximum core temperature 74.1°C 71.4°C
Maximum frequency 2.8 GHz 2.33 GHz
Number of cores 2 4
Transistor count 228 million 456 million
VID voltage range 0.8500V-1.3625V 0.8500V-1.3625V

Memory

Supported memory types DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Compatibility

Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Package Size 37.5mm x 37.5mm 37.5mm x 37.5mm
Sockets supported LGA775 LGA775
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

Security & Reliability

Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

Advanced Technologies

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
FSB parity
Idle States
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Thermal Monitoring

Virtualization

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)