Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7700
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 and Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo P7550
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.448 vs 0.344
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 October 2009 vs 2 September 2007 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.448 vs 0.344 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T7700
- Around 6% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 2.26 GHz
- Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90°C
- Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 948 vs 856
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 298 vs 291
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.26 vs 0.247
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 17.798 vs 15.219
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.074 vs 0.073
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.895 vs 1.772
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 2.26 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 90°C |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 3 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 948 vs 856 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 298 vs 291 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 506 vs 505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.26 vs 0.247 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 17.798 vs 15.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.074 vs 0.073 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.895 vs 1.772 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo P7550
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T7700
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 969 | 969 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 856 | 948 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 291 | 298 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 505 | 506 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.247 | 0.26 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.219 | 17.798 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.073 | 0.074 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.448 | 0.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.772 | 1.895 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Penryn | Merom |
| Launch date | 1 October 2009 | 2 September 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 3196 | 3198 |
| Price now | $229.99 | $59.95 |
| Processor Number | P7550 | T7700 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.94 | 6.97 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $307 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.26 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 4096 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.26 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 410 million | 291 million |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Sockets supported | PGA478 | PPGA478, PBGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 with others
IntelCore 2 Duo P7550 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T7700
IntelCore 2 Duo P7550 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo P8600
IntelCore 2 Duo P7550 vs
IntelCore i3-2377M
