Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P7350
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 and Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 25 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 759 vs 749
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 463 vs 457
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 15.868 vs 13.882
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 August 2008 vs 15 July 2008 |
L2 cache | 6134 KB vs 3072 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 759 vs 749 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 463 vs 457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.868 vs 13.882 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo P7350
- Around 8% higher clock speed: 2 GHz vs 1.86 GHz
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 796 vs 786
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 270 vs 261
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.217 vs 0.202
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.065 vs 0.06
- Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.421 vs 0.241
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.576 vs 1.428
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2 GHz vs 1.86 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 796 vs 786 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 270 vs 261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.217 vs 0.202 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.065 vs 0.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.421 vs 0.241 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.576 vs 1.428 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo P7350
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 | Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 786 | 796 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 759 | 749 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 261 | 270 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 463 | 457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.202 | 0.217 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.868 | 13.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.06 | 0.065 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.241 | 0.421 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.428 | 1.576 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 | Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Penryn | Penryn |
Launch date | 20 August 2008 | 15 July 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $284 | |
Place in performance rating | 3245 | 3246 |
Price now | $253 | $19.99 |
Processor Number | SL9400 | P7350 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.47 | 19.03 |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 1.86 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 1066 MHz FSB |
Die size | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 1066 MHz |
L2 cache | 6134 KB | 3072 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | |
Maximum frequency | 1.86 GHz | 2 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
Transistor count | 410 million | 410 million |
VID voltage range | 1.050V - 1.150V | 1.062V-1.150V |
L1 cache | 128 KB | |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 22mm x 22mm | 35mm x 35mm |
Sockets supported | BGA956 | PGA478, BGA479 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 25 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |