Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7300
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 and Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 100°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 786 vs 762
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 759 vs 678
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 463 vs 441
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 August 2008 vs 9 May 2007 |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 100°C |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
L2 cache | 6134 KB vs 4096 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 786 vs 762 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 759 vs 678 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 463 vs 441 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T7300
- Around 8% higher clock speed: 2 GHz vs 1.86 GHz
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 266 vs 261
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.218 vs 0.202
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 15.996 vs 15.868
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.073 vs 0.06
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.317 vs 0.241
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.613 vs 1.428
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2 GHz vs 1.86 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 266 vs 261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.218 vs 0.202 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.996 vs 15.868 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.073 vs 0.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.317 vs 0.241 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.613 vs 1.428 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 786 | 762 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 759 | 678 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 261 | 266 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 463 | 441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.202 | 0.218 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.868 | 15.996 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.06 | 0.073 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.241 | 0.317 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.428 | 1.613 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Penryn | Merom |
Launch date | 20 August 2008 | 9 May 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $284 | $234 |
Place in performance rating | 3245 | 3248 |
Price now | $253 | $30.99 |
Processor Number | SL9400 | T7300 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.47 | 11.33 |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 1.86 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
Die size | 107 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 800 MHz |
L2 cache | 6134 KB | 4096 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 100°C |
Maximum frequency | 1.86 GHz | 2 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
Transistor count | 410 million | 291 million |
VID voltage range | 1.050V - 1.150V | |
L1 cache | 64 KB | |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 22mm x 22mm | 35mm x 35mm |
Sockets supported | BGA956 | PPGA478, PBGA479 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 35 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |