Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7300

Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 and Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400

  • CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 100°C
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
  • Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • Around 3% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 786 vs 762
  • Around 12% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 759 vs 680
  • Around 5% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 463 vs 441
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 20 August 2008 vs 9 May 2007
Maximum core temperature 105°C vs 100°C
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm vs 65 nm
L2 cache 6134 KB vs 4096 KB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 17 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 786 vs 762
PassMark - CPU mark 759 vs 680
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 463 vs 441

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T7300

  • Around 8% higher clock speed: 2 GHz vs 1.86 GHz
  • Around 2% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 266 vs 261
  • Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.218 vs 0.202
  • Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 15.996 vs 15.868
  • Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.073 vs 0.06
  • Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.317 vs 0.241
  • Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.613 vs 1.428
Specifications (specs)
Maximum frequency 2 GHz vs 1.86 GHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 266 vs 261
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.218 vs 0.202
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 15.996 vs 15.868
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.073 vs 0.06
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.317 vs 0.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1.613 vs 1.428

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
786
762
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
759
680
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
261
266
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
463
441
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.202
0.218
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
15.868
15.996
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.06
0.073
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.241
0.317
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.428
1.613
Name Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 Intel Core 2 Duo T7300
PassMark - Single thread mark 786 762
PassMark - CPU mark 759 680
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 261 266
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 463 441
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.202 0.218
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 15.868 15.996
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.06 0.073
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.241 0.317
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1.428 1.613

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 Intel Core 2 Duo T7300

Essentials

Architecture codename Penryn Merom
Launch date 20 August 2008 9 May 2007
Launch price (MSRP) $284 $234
Place in performance rating 3245 3248
Price now $253 $30.99
Processor Number SL9400 T7300
Series Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status Discontinued Discontinued
Value for money (0-100) 1.47 11.33
Vertical segment Mobile Mobile

Performance

64 bit support
Base frequency 1.86 GHz 2.00 GHz
Bus Speed 1066 MHz FSB 800 MHz FSB
Die size 107 mm2 143 mm2
Front-side bus (FSB) 1066 MHz 800 MHz
L2 cache 6134 KB 4096 KB
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm 65 nm
Maximum core temperature 105°C 100°C
Maximum frequency 1.86 GHz 2 GHz
Number of cores 2 2
Number of threads 2 2
Transistor count 410 million 291 million
VID voltage range 1.050V - 1.150V
L1 cache 64 KB

Compatibility

Low Halogen Options Available
Package Size 22mm x 22mm 35mm x 35mm
Sockets supported BGA956 PPGA478, PBGA479
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 17 Watt 35 Watt
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1

Security & Reliability

Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

Advanced Technologies

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
FSB parity
Idle States
Intel 64
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology

Virtualization

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 with others

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 Intel
Core 2 Duo SL9400
vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 Intel
Core 2 Duo T7300
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 Intel
Core 2 Duo SL9400
vs Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 Intel
Core 2 Duo P7350
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 Intel
Core 2 Duo SL9400
vs Intel Atom N475 Intel
Atom N475