Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 and Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher clock speed: 3.06 GHz vs 2.92 GHz
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 444 vs 362
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 760 vs 696
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.324 vs 0.31
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.322 vs 2.253
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 April 2009 vs 1 January 2009 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.06 GHz vs 2.92 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 444 vs 362 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 760 vs 696 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.324 vs 0.31 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.622 vs 0.621 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.322 vs 2.253 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1236 vs 1183
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1216 vs 1187
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 24.171 vs 23.559
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.097 vs 0.094
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1236 vs 1183 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1216 vs 1187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.171 vs 23.559 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.097 vs 0.094 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1183 | 1236 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1187 | 1216 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 444 | 362 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 760 | 696 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.324 | 0.31 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 23.559 | 24.171 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.094 | 0.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.622 | 0.621 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.322 | 2.253 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Penryn | Penryn |
| Launch date | 1 April 2009 | 1 January 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $530 | $530 |
| Place in performance rating | 3060 | 3062 |
| Price now | $398.95 | $423.89 |
| Processor Number | T9900 | T9800 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.57 | 1.40 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.06 GHz | 2.93 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 1066 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 1066 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 6134 KB | 6134 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 105°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.06 GHz | 2.92 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 410 million | 410 million |
| VID voltage range | 1.050V-1.2125V | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Sockets supported | BGA479, PGA478 | PGA478, BGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 with others
IntelCore 2 Duo T9900 vs
IntelPentium M 1.50
IntelCore 2 Duo T9900 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T9800
IntelCore 2 Duo T9900 vs
IntelCeleron N2920
