Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 versus Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 et Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.06 GHz versus 2.92 GHz
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 444 versus 362
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 760 versus 696
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.324 versus 0.31
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.322 versus 2.253
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 April 2009 versus 1 January 2009 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.06 GHz versus 2.92 GHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 444 versus 362 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 760 versus 696 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.324 versus 0.31 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.622 versus 0.621 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.322 versus 2.253 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1236 versus 1185
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1216 versus 1189
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 24.171 versus 23.559
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.097 versus 0.094
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1236 versus 1185 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1216 versus 1189 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.171 versus 23.559 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.097 versus 0.094 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1185 | 1236 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1189 | 1216 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 444 | 362 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 760 | 696 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.324 | 0.31 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 23.559 | 24.171 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.094 | 0.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.622 | 0.621 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.322 | 2.253 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Penryn | Penryn |
| Date de sortie | 1 April 2009 | 1 January 2009 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $530 | $530 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 3061 | 3063 |
| Prix maintenant | $398.95 | $423.89 |
| Processor Number | T9900 | T9800 |
| Série | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 1.57 | 1.40 |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3.06 GHz | 2.93 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 1066 MHz FSB |
| Taille de dé | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 1066 MHz |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| Cache L2 | 6134 KB | 6134 KB |
| Processus de fabrication | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105°C | 105°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.06 GHz | 2.92 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 2 |
| Compte de transistor | 410 million | 410 million |
| Rangée de tension VID | 1.050V-1.2125V | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | BGA479, PGA478 | PGA478, BGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 avec des autres
IntelCore 2 Duo T9900 vs
IntelPentium M 1.50
IntelCore 2 Duo T9900 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T9800
IntelCore 2 Duo T9900 vs
IntelCeleron N2920
