Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P8700
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 6% higher clock speed: 2.67 GHz vs 2.53 GHz
- Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1141 vs 1022
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2068 vs 962
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 362 vs 336
- Around 95% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1139 vs 584
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.609 vs 0.273
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 20.494 vs 16.217
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.4 vs 0.548
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.93 vs 1.998
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.171 vs 0.076
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | April 2009 vs 1 January 2009 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 2.67 GHz vs 2.53 GHz |
L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 3072 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1141 vs 1022 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2068 vs 962 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 362 vs 336 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1139 vs 584 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.609 vs 0.273 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 20.494 vs 16.217 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.4 vs 0.548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.93 vs 1.998 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.171 vs 0.076 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo P8700
- Around 47% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 71.4°C
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 95 Watt
Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 71.4°C |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo P8700
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400 | Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1141 | 1022 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2068 | 962 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 362 | 336 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1139 | 584 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.609 | 0.273 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 20.494 | 16.217 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.4 | 0.548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.93 | 1.998 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.171 | 0.076 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400 | Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Yorkfield | Penryn |
Launch date | April 2009 | 1 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 3019 | 3179 |
Price now | $99.50 | $37.99 |
Processor Number | Q8400 | P8700 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.38 | 12.60 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Mobile |
Launch price (MSRP) | $209 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.66 GHz | 2.53 GHz |
Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | 1066 MHz FSB |
Die size | 164 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
L1 cache | 256 KB | |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | 3072 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | |
Maximum core temperature | 71.4°C | 105°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.67 GHz | 2.53 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Transistor count | 456 million | 410 million |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | 1.00V - 1.25V |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | |
Number of threads | 2 | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 35mm x 35mm |
Sockets supported | LGA775 | BGA479, PGA478 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 25 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |