Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500 vs Intel Core i3-550
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Intel Core i3-550 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2240 vs 1625
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1225 vs 1061
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.762 vs 0.529
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.158 vs 0.156
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2240 vs 1625 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1225 vs 1061 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.762 vs 0.529 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.158 vs 0.156 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-550
- Around 2% higher maximum core temperature: 72.6°C vs 71.4°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 73 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1343 vs 1213
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 478 vs 395
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 31.203 vs 28.113
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum core temperature | 72.6°C vs 71.4°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 73 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1343 vs 1213 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 478 vs 395 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 31.203 vs 28.113 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-550
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500 | Intel Core i3-550 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1213 | 1343 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2240 | 1625 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 395 | 478 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1225 | 1061 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.762 | 0.529 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 28.113 | 31.203 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.158 | 0.156 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.842 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500 | Intel Core i3-550 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield | Clarkdale |
| Place in performance rating | 2941 | 2933 |
| Processor Number | Q9500 | i3-550 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch date | May 2010 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $101 | |
| Price now | $179.95 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 4.63 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.83 GHz | 3.20 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | 2.5 GT/s DMI |
| Die size | 164 mm2 | 81 mm2 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 71.4°C | 72.6°C |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 456 million | 382 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | 0.6500V-1.4000V |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | |
| L3 cache | 4096 KB (shared) | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz | |
| Number of threads | 4 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | LGA775 | FCLGA1156 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 73 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 16.38 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 1066/1333 | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 733 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8 | |
