Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Intel Celeron J1800
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 and Intel Celeron J1800 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 85% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1220 vs 658
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2346 vs 573
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 30.904 vs 7.14
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.175 vs 0.078
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.476 vs 1.007
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1220 vs 658 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2346 vs 573 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.904 vs 7.14 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.175 vs 0.078 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.476 vs 1.007 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron J1800
- Around 47% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 71.4°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 45 nm
- 9.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.151 vs 0.612
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 71.4°C |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 45 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.151 vs 0.612 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
CPU 2: Intel Celeron J1800
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 | Intel Celeron J1800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1220 | 658 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2346 | 573 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1299 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.612 | 1.151 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.904 | 7.14 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.175 | 0.078 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.258 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.476 | 1.007 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1389 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1389 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 | Intel Celeron J1800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Yorkfield | Bay Trail |
Launch date | Q1'08 | 1 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 3015 | 3030 |
Processor Number | Q9550 | J1800 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series |
Status | Discontinued | Launched |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $72 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.83 GHz | 2.41 GHz |
Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
Die size | 214 mm2 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 22 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 71.4°C | 105°C |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Transistor count | 820 million | |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
L1 cache | 112 KB | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | |
Maximum frequency | 2.58 GHz | |
Number of threads | 2 | |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 25mm X 27mm |
Sockets supported | LGA775 | FCBGA1170 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 10 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Anti-Theft technology | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
Supported memory types | DDR3L 1333 | |
Graphics |
||
Graphics base frequency | 688 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 792 MHz | |
Graphics max frequency | 792 MHz | |
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
Number of displays supported | 2 | |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | |
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
PCIe configurations | X4, X2, X1 |