Intel Core Duo ULV L2400 vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+ EE

Comparative analysis of Intel Core Duo ULV L2400 and AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+ EE processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Core Duo ULV L2400

  • CPU is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 90 nm
  • 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • 7.2x lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 65 Watt
Launch date September 2006 vs August 2006
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm vs 90 nm
L2 cache 2048 KB vs 256 KB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 9 Watt vs 65 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+ EE

  • Around 87% higher clock speed: 2 GHz vs 1.07 GHz
Maximum frequency 2 GHz vs 1.07 GHz

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Core Duo ULV L2400 AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+ EE

Essentials

Architecture codename Yonah Windsor
Launch date September 2006 August 2006
Place in performance rating not rated not rated
Vertical segment Laptop Desktop

Performance

Die size 90 mm 220 mm
L2 cache 2048 KB 256 KB
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm 90 nm
Maximum frequency 1.07 GHz 2 GHz
Number of cores 2 2
Transistor count 151 million 154 million
64 bit support
L1 cache 256 KB

Memory

Supported memory types DDR1

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported 479 AM2
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 9 Watt 65 Watt

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare Intel Core Duo ULV L2400 with others

Intel Core Duo ULV L2400 Intel
Core Duo ULV L2400
vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+ EE AMD
Athlon 64 X2 3600+ EE
Intel Core Duo ULV L2400 Intel
Core Duo ULV L2400
vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 Intel
Core 2 Duo T7600
Intel Core Duo ULV L2400 Intel
Core Duo ULV L2400
vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 Intel
Core 2 Duo T7400