Intel Core Duo ULV L2400 vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+ EE
Comparative analysis of Intel Core Duo ULV L2400 and AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+ EE processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core Duo ULV L2400
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 7.2x lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 65 Watt
Launch date | September 2006 vs August 2006 |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
L2 cache | 2048 KB vs 256 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+ EE
- Around 87% higher clock speed: 2 GHz vs 1.07 GHz
Maximum frequency | 2 GHz vs 1.07 GHz |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core Duo ULV L2400 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+ EE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Yonah | Windsor |
Launch date | September 2006 | August 2006 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
Die size | 90 mm | 220 mm |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 256 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1.07 GHz | 2 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Transistor count | 151 million | 154 million |
64 bit support | ||
L1 cache | 256 KB | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | 479 | AM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt | 65 Watt |