Intel Core i3-10300T vs Intel Celeron G3950
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-10300T and Intel Celeron G3950 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-10300T
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 6 more threads: 8 vs 2
- Around 30% higher clock speed: 3.90 GHz vs 3 GHz
- 4x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 2x more maximum memory size: 128 GB vs 64 GB
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 51 Watt
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1693 vs 963
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1693 vs 963
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3458 vs 3358
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3458 vs 3358
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2342 vs 1851
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 8003 vs 2322
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2020 vs January 2017 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 8 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.90 GHz vs 3 GHz |
| L3 cache | 8 MB vs 2048 KB (shared) |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB vs 64 GB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 51 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1693 vs 963 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1693 vs 963 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3458 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3458 vs 3358 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2342 vs 1851 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 8003 vs 2322 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron G3950
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2572 vs 1454
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2572 vs 1454
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2572 vs 1454 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2572 vs 1454 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i3-10300T
CPU 2: Intel Celeron G3950
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i3-10300T | Intel Celeron G3950 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1693 | 963 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1693 | 963 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1454 | 2572 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1454 | 2572 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3458 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3458 | 3358 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2342 | 1851 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 8003 | 2322 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i3-10300T | Intel Celeron G3950 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Comet Lake | Kaby Lake |
| Launch date | 27 May 2020 | January 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $143 | $126 |
| Place in performance rating | 1125 | 1135 |
| Processor Number | i3-10300T | G3950 |
| Series | 10th Generation Intel Core i3 Processors | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $71.22 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.43 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.00 GHz | 3.00 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s DMI3 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 2048 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.90 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 8 | 2 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | |
| Number of QPI Links | 0 | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600 @ 1.35V |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x9BC8 | 0x5902 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Processor graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel® HD Graphics 610 |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2160@30Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 25 Watt | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 2.50 GHz | |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | LGA 1200 | FCLGA1151 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 51 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015B | PCG 2015C (65W) |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i3-10300T with others
IntelCore i3-10300T vs
IntelCeleron G3950
IntelCore i3-10300T vs
AMDRyzen Embedded V1756B
IntelCore i3-10300T vs
IntelCore i5-9600KF
IntelCore i3-10300T vs
AMDAthlon Silver PRO 3125GE
IntelCore i3-10300T vs
AMDAthlon Silver 3050GE
IntelCore i3-10300T vs
IntelPentium Gold G6400T
