Intel Core i3-380M vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-380M and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-380M
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher maximum core temperature: 90°C for rPGA, 105°C for BGA vs 71.4°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.518 vs 0.094
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 26 September 2010 vs August 2008 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C for rPGA, 105°C for BGA vs 71.4°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.518 vs 0.094 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 6% higher clock speed: 2.67 GHz vs 2.53 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 12x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1139 vs 1021
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2150 vs 1205
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 376 vs 365
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1151 vs 788
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.574 vs 0.428
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 26.509 vs 19.608
- 6.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.189 vs 0.618
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.67 GHz vs 2.53 GHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB vs 512 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1139 vs 1021 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2150 vs 1205 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 376 vs 365 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1151 vs 788 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.574 vs 0.428 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 26.509 vs 19.608 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.189 vs 0.618 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i3-380M
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i3-380M | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1021 | 1139 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1205 | 2150 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 365 | 376 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 788 | 1151 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.428 | 0.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 19.608 | 26.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.518 | 0.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.618 | 4.189 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.136 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i3-380M | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Arrandale | Yorkfield |
| Launch date | 26 September 2010 | August 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $49 | |
| Place in performance rating | 3125 | 3130 |
| Price now | $49 | $33.98 |
| Processor Number | i3-380M | Q9400 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.59 | 28.99 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.53 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 2.5 GT/s DMI | 1333 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 81 mm2 | 164 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 2500 MHz | |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 6144 KB |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C for rPGA, 105°C for BGA | 71.4°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.53 GHz | 2.67 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 | |
| Transistor count | 382 million | 456 million |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 800/1066 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 500 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 667 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 667 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | rPGA 37.5mmx 37.5mm, BGA 34mmx28mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | PGA988 | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 95 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i3-380M with others
IntelCore i3-380M vs
IntelPentium Dual Core T2370
IntelCore i3-380M vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T9600
IntelCore i3-380M vs
IntelCore i3-370M
