Intel Core i3-7300 vs AMD A10-5800K
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-7300 and AMD A10-5800K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-7300
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 96% lower typical power consumption: 51 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2408 vs 1491
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 4530 vs 2956
- Around 97% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1031 vs 523
- Around 53% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2248 vs 1469
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.222 vs 4.37
- 8.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 86.44 vs 9.891
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.523 vs 0.206
- 5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.291 vs 0.594
- 8.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.611 vs 3.484
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1706 vs 1020
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1706 vs 1020
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | January 2017 vs 26 September 2012 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2408 vs 1491 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 4530 vs 2956 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1031 vs 523 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2248 vs 1469 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.222 vs 4.37 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 86.44 vs 9.891 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.523 vs 0.206 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.291 vs 0.594 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.611 vs 3.484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1706 vs 1020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1706 vs 1020 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A10-5800K
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 5% higher clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 4 GHz
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2453 vs 747
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5148 vs 1437
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2453 vs 747
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5148 vs 1437
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 4.2 GHz vs 4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 256 KB (per core) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2453 vs 747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5148 vs 1437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2453 vs 747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5148 vs 1437 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i3-7300
CPU 2: AMD A10-5800K
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i3-7300 | AMD A10-5800K |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2408 | 1491 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 4530 | 2956 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1031 | 523 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2248 | 1469 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.222 | 4.37 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 86.44 | 9.891 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.523 | 0.206 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.291 | 0.594 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.611 | 3.484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1706 | 1020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 747 | 2453 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1437 | 5148 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1706 | 1020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 747 | 2453 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1437 | 5148 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i3-7300 | AMD A10-5800K | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Kaby Lake | Trinity |
| Launch date | January 2017 | 26 September 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $167 | $122 |
| Place in performance rating | 1812 | 1816 |
| Price now | $362 | |
| Processor Number | i3-7300 | |
| Series | 7th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors | AMD A-Series (Desktop) |
| Status | Launched | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 5.24 | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 4.00 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 4096 KB |
| L3 cache | 4096 KB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | 74 °C |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 4 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of QPI Links | 0 | |
| Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
| Die size | 246 mm | |
| Transistor count | 1303 Million | |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x5912 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.15 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 64 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 630 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1151 | FM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i3-7300 with others
IntelCore i3-7300 vs
AMDA10-5800K
IntelCore i3-7300 vs
IntelCeleron G1620T
IntelCore i3-7300 vs
IntelPentium G3250
IntelCore i3-7300 vs
AMDFX-8370E
IntelCore i3-7300 vs
AMDRyzen 5 1600
IntelCore i3-7300 vs
IntelCore i5-3340S
