Intel Core i5-10400 vs Intel Core i7-8700T
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i5-10400 and Intel Core i7-8700T processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-10400
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher clock speed: 4.30 GHz vs 4.00 GHz
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1953 vs 1797
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1953 vs 1797
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2568 vs 2305
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 12116 vs 10185
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2020 vs April 2018 |
| Maximum frequency | 4.30 GHz vs 4.00 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1953 vs 1797 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1953 vs 1797 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2568 vs 2305 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 12116 vs 10185 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-8700T
- Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5227 vs 4164
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5227 vs 4164
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7864 vs 6744
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7864 vs 6744
- Around 42% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 6753 vs 4739
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5227 vs 4164 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5227 vs 4164 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7864 vs 6744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7864 vs 6744 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 6753 vs 4739 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-10400
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-8700T
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-10400 | Intel Core i7-8700T |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1953 | 1797 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1953 | 1797 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4164 | 5227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4164 | 5227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6744 | 7864 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6744 | 7864 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2568 | 2305 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 12116 | 10185 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 4739 | 6753 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1054 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4983 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i5-10400 | Intel Core i7-8700T | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Comet Lake | Coffee Lake |
| Launch date | 27 May 2020 | April 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $182 | |
| Place in performance rating | 531 | 527 |
| Processor Number | i5-10400 | i7-8700T |
| Series | 10th Generation Intel Core i5 Processors | 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $429 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.58 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.90 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s DMI3 |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 12288 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 4.30 GHz | 4.00 GHz |
| Number of cores | 6 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 12 | 12 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x9BC8 / 0x9BC5 | 0x3E92 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1.20 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Processor graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2160@30Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C | PCG 2015A (35W) |
| Configurable TDP-down | 25 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 1.90 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1151 | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i5-10400 with others
IntelCore i5-10400 vs
IntelXeon W-3175X
IntelCore i5-10400 vs
AMDRyzen 9 3950X
IntelCore i5-10400 vs
IntelCore i9-10900K
IntelCore i5-10400 vs
AMDRyzen 7 5700X
IntelCore i5-10400 vs
AMDRyzen 7 5800X3D
IntelCore i5-10400 vs
IntelCore i3-12300T
