Intel Core i7-4765T vs Intel Xeon E5-2670
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i7-4765T and Intel Xeon E5-2670 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-4765T
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1626 vs 1489
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 684 vs 602
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.433 vs 7.119
- Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 177.387 vs 88.939
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.239 vs 0.885
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.229 vs 3.609
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 13.193 vs 8.475
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | June 2013 vs March 2012 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 115 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1626 vs 1489 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 684 vs 602 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.433 vs 7.119 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 177.387 vs 88.939 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.239 vs 0.885 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.229 vs 3.609 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.193 vs 8.475 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E5-2670
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
- 8 more threads: 16 vs 8
- Around 10% higher clock speed: 3.30 GHz vs 3.00 GHz
- Around 21% higher maximum core temperature: 80.0°C vs 66.35°C
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.5x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 12x more maximum memory size: 384 GB vs 32 GB
- 3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 15492 vs 5113
- Around 85% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 4635 vs 2511
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 8 vs 4 |
| Number of threads | 16 vs 8 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.30 GHz vs 3.00 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 80.0°C vs 66.35°C |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 20480 KB (shared) vs 8192 KB (shared) |
| Maximum memory size | 384 GB vs 32 GB |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 15492 vs 5113 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4635 vs 2511 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-4765T
CPU 2: Intel Xeon E5-2670
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i7-4765T | Intel Xeon E5-2670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1626 | 1489 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5113 | 15492 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 684 | 602 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2511 | 4635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.433 | 7.119 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 177.387 | 88.939 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.239 | 0.885 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.229 | 3.609 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.193 | 8.475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1033 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1882 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4213 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1033 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1882 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4213 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i7-4765T | Intel Xeon E5-2670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Haswell | Sandy Bridge EP |
| Launch date | June 2013 | March 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $509 | $145 |
| Place in performance rating | 1489 | 2226 |
| Price now | $399.99 | $96.48 |
| Processor Number | i7-4765T | E5-2670 |
| Series | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors | Intel® Xeon® Processor E5 Family |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 5.38 | 37.05 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Server |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.00 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 8 GT/s QPI |
| Die size | 177 mm | 435 mm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | 20480 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 66 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 66.35°C | 80.0°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.00 GHz | 3.30 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
| Number of threads | 8 | 16 |
| Transistor count | 1400 million | 2270 million |
| Number of QPI Links | 2 | |
| VID voltage range | 0.60V-1.35V | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 384 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | DDR3 800/1066/1333/1600 |
| ECC memory support | ||
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x412 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.20 GHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.2 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 2 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| VGA | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
| Max resolution over VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 52.5mm x 45.0mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1150 | FCLGA2011 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2013A | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 40 |
| PCI Express revision | Up to 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 2S Only |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® AVX |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i7-4765T with others
IntelCore i7-4765T vs
AMDPhenom II X3 B75
IntelCore i7-4765T vs
AMDAthlon II X2 265
IntelCore i7-4765T vs
AMDA10-6800K
IntelCore i7-4765T vs
IntelCore i5-6400T
IntelCore i7-4765T vs
IntelPentium G2030T
IntelCore i7-4765T vs
IntelCore i5-4460S
