Intel Pentium G3240 vs Intel Celeron G3900
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium G3240 and Intel Celeron G3900 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium G3240
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1743 vs 1690
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1698 vs 1554
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1698 vs 1554
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1743 vs 1690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1698 vs 1554 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1698 vs 1554 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron G3900
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Around 4% lower typical power consumption: 51 Watt vs 53 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2148 vs 1944
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 678 vs 619
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1244 vs 1101
- 5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.745 vs 1.408
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 34.175 vs 30.618
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.264 vs 0.253
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.171 vs 0.942
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 7.573 vs 2.832
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 861 vs 614
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2853 vs 2835
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 861 vs 614
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2853 vs 2835
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 32 GB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt vs 53 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2148 vs 1944 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 678 vs 619 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1244 vs 1101 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.745 vs 1.408 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 34.175 vs 30.618 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.264 vs 0.253 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.171 vs 0.942 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.573 vs 2.832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 861 vs 614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2853 vs 2835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 861 vs 614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2853 vs 2835 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium G3240
CPU 2: Intel Celeron G3900
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Pentium G3240 | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1743 | 1690 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1944 | 2148 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 619 | 678 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1101 | 1244 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.408 | 7.745 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.618 | 34.175 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.253 | 0.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.942 | 1.171 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.832 | 7.573 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 614 | 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1698 | 1554 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2835 | 2853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 614 | 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1698 | 1554 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2835 | 2853 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium G3240 | Intel Celeron G3900 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Haswell | Skylake |
| Launch date | Q2'14 | September 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 2201 | 2193 |
| Processor Number | G3240 | G3900 |
| Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor G Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series |
| Status | Discontinued | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $50 | |
| Price now | $52.62 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.63 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.10 GHz | 2.80 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 8 GT/s DMI3 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 72°C | |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Die size | 150 mm | |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | |
| L3 cache | 4096 KB (shared) | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz | |
| Transistor count | 1400 million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333 @ 1.5V | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V |
| ECC memory support | ||
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | 950 MHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 1.7 GB | 64 GB |
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 510 |
| Device ID | 0x1902 | |
| Graphics max frequency | 950 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| VGA | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 2560x1600@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | 2560x1600@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 1920x1080@60Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Max resolution over VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | N / A |
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over WiDi | 1080p | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.1/12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1150 | FCLGA1151 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt | 51 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2013C | PCG 2015C (65W) |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | Up to 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Pentium G3240 with others
IntelPentium G3240 vs
AMDAthlon II X3 420e
IntelPentium G3240 vs
IntelCeleron G440
IntelPentium G3240 vs
AMDFX-6120
IntelPentium G3240 vs
AMDA4-5300B
IntelPentium G3240 vs
IntelPentium G5600E
IntelPentium G3240 vs
IntelCore i3-9100HL
