Intel Xeon E5-2689 vs Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon E5-2689 and Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E5-2689
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
- 8 more threads: 16 vs 8
- 12x more maximum memory size: 384 GB vs 32 GB
- Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.219 vs 5.137
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 123.121 vs 78.031
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.974 vs 0.588
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.868 vs 2.47
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 9.539 vs 6.089
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 8 vs 4 |
Number of threads | 16 vs 8 |
Maximum memory size | 384 GB vs 32 GB |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.219 vs 5.137 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 123.121 vs 78.031 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.974 vs 0.588 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.868 vs 2.47 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.539 vs 6.089 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3
- Around 6% higher clock speed: 3.80 GHz vs 3.6 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 115 Watt
Maximum frequency | 3.80 GHz vs 3.6 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon E5-2689
CPU 2: Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Xeon E5-2689 | Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.219 | 5.137 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 123.121 | 78.031 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.974 | 0.588 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.868 | 2.47 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.539 | 6.089 |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2149 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 7048 | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 891 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3386 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2290 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Xeon E5-2689 | Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge | Haswell |
Launch date | 6 Mar 2012 | Q2'14 |
Place in performance rating | 2151 | 2145 |
Processor Number | E5-2689 | E3-1231V3 |
Vertical segment | Server | Server |
Series | Intel® Xeon® Processor E3 v3 Family | |
Status | Launched | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3.40 GHz |
Bus Speed | 8 GT/s QPI | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 22 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 52°C | |
Maximum frequency | 3.6 GHz | 3.80 GHz |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Number of QPI Links | 2 | 0 |
Number of threads | 16 | 8 |
VID voltage range | 0.6V - 1.35V | |
Memory |
||
ECC memory support | ||
Max memory channels | 4 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
Maximum memory size | 384 GB | 32 GB |
Supported memory types | DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600 | DDR3 and DDR3L 1333/1600 at 1.5V |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
Sockets supported | LGA2011 | FCLGA1150 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 80 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Thermal Solution | PCG 2013D | |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 40 | 16 |
PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCIe configurations | x4, x8, x16 | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8/2x4 |
Scalability | 2S | 1S Only |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Anti-Theft technology | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |