Intel Xeon E5-2689 vs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon E5-2689 and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E5-2689
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
- 12 more threads: 16 vs 4
- 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 123.121 vs 23.998
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.974 vs 0.472
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.868 vs 1.646
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 9.539 vs 6.701
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 8 vs 4 |
| Number of threads | 16 vs 4 |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 123.121 vs 23.998 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.974 vs 0.472 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.868 vs 1.646 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.539 vs 6.701 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher clock speed: 3.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz
- Around 83% higher maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 52°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 77% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.505 vs 9.219
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 June 2017 vs 6 Mar 2012 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 95°C vs 52°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 115 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.505 vs 9.219 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon E5-2689
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Xeon E5-2689 | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.219 | 10.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 123.121 | 23.998 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.974 | 0.472 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.868 | 1.646 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.539 | 6.701 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2187 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 7234 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 878 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2580 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Xeon E5-2689 | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge | Zen |
| Launch date | 6 Mar 2012 | 29 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 2075 | 2110 |
| Processor Number | E5-2689 | |
| Vertical segment | Server | Desktop |
| Family | AMD Ryzen PRO Processors | |
| OPN Tray | YD130BBBM4KAE | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO Desktop Processors | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s QPI | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 52°C | 95°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
| Number of QPI Links | 2 | |
| Number of threads | 16 | 4 |
| VID voltage range | 0.6V - 1.35V | |
| Die size | 192 mm | |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | |
| Transistor count | 4800 million | |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 4 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 384 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600 | DDR4 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2667 MHz | |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | LGA2011 | AM4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 65 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 40 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 x16 |
| PCIe configurations | x4, x8, x16 | |
| Scalability | 2S | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| Extended Frequency Range (XFR) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
| TSM Encryption | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Xeon E5-2689 with others
IntelXeon E5-2689 vs
IntelXeon E5-1650
IntelXeon E5-2689 vs
IntelXeon E5-2620 v2
IntelXeon E5-2689 vs
AMDRyzen 3 PRO 1300
IntelXeon E5-2689 vs
IntelXeon E3-1231 v3
IntelXeon E5-2689 vs
AMDOpteron 1385
IntelXeon E5-2689 vs
AMDOpteron 6128 HE
